TheStupidItHurts: Grieving for Gain

Grievance politics dominates the Democrat Alinskyite Liberal methodology for moving America further and further toward the misery of Socialism, Communism, Marxism, i.e., Liberalism. In all its various forms Authoritarian Liberalism, whether Marxist, Socialist, Communist, etc., is the same no matter what flavor of Statism is being served up for we the people to choke upon.

See Saul Alinsky’s 12 rules for radicals. The current Democrat in the White House is a disciple and one-time teacher of Alinsky’s methods:

  1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
  2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
  3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
  4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
  5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
  6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
  7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
  8. “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
  9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
  10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
  11. “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
  12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
  13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

Rule #1. Make it seem like you, the Democrat Liberal, is the majority of the population when you’re really nothing because most reasonable individuals aren’t so stupid as you are to bleet along helping your Liberal leaders to enslave you…just like sheep to the slaughter.

Check out rules 2 and 3:

Per rule 2, going outside the expertise of your people results in confusion, fear and retreat so don’t do that. Per rule 3, however, always go outside the expertise of “the enemy” to look for ways to increase anxiety, insecurity and uncertainty. Who is the “enemy”? Did you know Democrat Liberals consider you an enemy if you don’t subscribe to their brand of political authoritarianism?

The non-Democrat Alinsky Liberal is the enemy folks. That means YOU. Do you believe the Democrat party is about peace? Do you believe Obama is interested in promoting peace? If you do, why do you believe it? The empirical evidence certainly points to the opposite conclusion wouldn’t you say?

George Soros and other rich Liberals are funding Marxist groups like Black Lives Matter and paying other individuals to do things like protest, e.g., in Ferguson MO and elsewhere.

“Evidence?”, you say? I’m so glad you asked! Check out these few examples of many I found doing a quick search of Cleveland’s (the site of the Republican convention) craigslist under jobs > nonprofit.

Want to make some money being a “community organizer”, i.e., a grievance group, a protestor, someone who beats up people at Trump rallies?

You Liberals want to get paid to complain? At least you’ll have a job.

Want to get paid to further Marxism in your own country, you stupid moron?

Posted in General | Leave a comment

TheStupidItHurts: The Liability of Liberalism

Like voting modern Democrat do you? Does it make you feel better somehow? Do you believe the modern Democrat Liberal cares about you and your problems?

Mother Jones (a bastion of Liberal “thought”) did an interesting piece on the number of mass shootings from 1982 to 2016 (including Dallas). What do you think they found?

Modern Democrats tell us they’re the party of inclusiveness, love, peace, hope, compassion, mercy, forgiveness, etc., and therefore you should continue to vote for them on that logic.

Ok let’s grant them that premise.

If that were so, one would not be irrational to believe that when they’re in power there should be peace. After all, if the party of peace and love is implementing solutions based on peace and love there should be peace and love should there not?? But is there peace and love when Democrat Liberals rule, or is there violence, hatred and strife?

Let’s look at the empirical evidence according to Mother Jones:

From 08/20/1982 to 12/05/2007 (25 years) there were a total of 44 incidents in which a total of 354 people died in a mass shooting. It would appear that 3 or more individuals dead is the definition for a “mass shooting” in this survey.

So from August of 1982 to December of 2007, a period of 25 years, 354 people died in mass shootings. That equates to 13 people per year over 25 years dying in mass shootings of 3 or more people.

Now what happens beginning in 2008 (the year Barack Obama was sworn in as president of the nation)?

From 2/7/2008 to 6/12/2016 (8 years) there have been (so far) a total of 39 incidents in which 325 people died in a mass shooting of 3 or more people. That equates to +/- 40 people per year over just 8 years dying in mass shootings.

354 dead over 25 years prior to the disciple of Saul Alinsky (Barack Obama) coming to power. After the disciple of Alinsky is inaugurated and with the blessing of a non-existent opposition party 325 are dead over just 8 years.

What do you make of this?

In just 8 years of modern Democrat Alinsky Liberalism, the philosophy of peace, love, prosperity, inclusiveness, tolerance, forgiveness, etc., almost the same amount of people have died in mass shootings as died for the prior 25 years.

Do you believe Democrat Alinsky Liberals want peace in the nation? If you believe this, why do you believe it?

What need would there be for Liberals if all the grievances of the various groups they purport to represent were finally satisfied?

If there’s no need for Liberals, how will they retain their positions of authority? If they do not retain their positions of authority, how will they funnel taxpayer monies to themselves to buy their cars, clothes, houses and jewels? How will they funnel taxpayer funds to their various campaign coffers? How will they funnel taxpayer monies to the charities they run? How will they funnel taxpayer funds to the businesses they and their friends run?

Don’t forget Solyndra.

How will they dine at the finest restaurants, how will they purchase the finest copies of Piss Christ at New York art auctions? How will they impose their will on the common man?

How will they continue to suck the life out of the nation while enriching themselves off the backs of the common man if the grievance groups are satisfied and they (that is, the Alinsky Democrats) are no longer “needed”?

Ask yourself a common sense question –

“Does modern Democrat Alinsky Liberalism survive if they actually implement real solutions that will truly work to correct the problems they tell us the nation faces? If not, what is the incentive for Democrat Alinsky Liberals to implement real solutions?” 

Naturally you must also consider whether the problems the Alinsky Liberal identifies are even real problems in the first place. Don’t ever forget a Liberal will lie for the cause like a Muslim will lie for Taqiyya. 

Did you hear Hillary Clinton recently? Did you hear her say how in the first 100 days of her administration she will begin to implement “real” economic policies to bring back the highest paying jobs we’ve ever seen in the country since time began?

Well why not now?

If Democrat Liberals know how make these jobs happen why not DO IT NOW? Why are they waiting?? 94 MILLION Americans are out of work and need a job NOW!

Why wait?  What better way to get elected than to have some of those 94 MILLION out of work Americans working before November wouldn’t you say?

So why then? Why wait?

Friends, brethren and countrymen…think about it.

Remember the mantra for the modern Lenin-Alinsky Democrat:

We must be ready to employ trickery, deceit, law-breaking, withholding and concealing truth… We can and must write in a language which sows among the masses hate, revulsion, and scorn toward those who disagree with us.”
– Vladimir Lenin

Posted in General | Leave a comment

TheStupidItHurts: Introducing Saul Alinsky

Read the full article in this document: Saul Alinsky

Saul Alinsky:

  • Identified a set of very specific rules that ordinary citizens could follow, and tactics that ordinary citizens could employ, as a means of gaining public power
  • Created a blueprint for revolution under the banner of “social change”
  • Two of his most notable modern-day disciples are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Born to Russian-Jewish parents in Chicago in 1909, Saul Alinsky was a Communist/Marxist fellow-traveler who helped establish the tactics of infiltration — coupled with a measure of confrontation — that have been central to revolutionary political movements in the United States in recent decades. He never joined the Communist Party but instead, as David Horowitz puts it, became an avatar of the post-modern left.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

TheStupidItHurts: Socialism In Practice

Want to see an example of what happens when modern authoritarian Liberals rule a country?

While the common man waits for hours in the street for food, suffers utility shortages, skyrocketing prices, inflation and other miseries of Liberalism, Pres. Nicolas Maduro and the rest of the bourgeoisie Socialists continue to count the money they’ve made on the backs of the people.

Reckon the Venezuelan equivalent to American Democrats are enjoying their Liberalism in Venezuela right now?

These are Socialists. This is Socialism.

Here’s what America might look like in a couple of generations (or less, perhaps) if modern Democrats should ever succeed in their goal to “fundamentally transform America”:

Poor, bereaved, hopeless: faces of Venezuela crisis

Venezuelans are suffering economic and political turmoil that has caused food shortages and deadly unrest over recent months.

Venezuelans barter diapers for food on smartphones

A kilo of pasta gets you a packet of diapers. A bag of flour buys a bottle of shampoo.
Short on basic supplies, Venezuelans have reverted to ancient shopping habits: bartering whatever they have

‘We want food!’: Venezuela crisis deepens

It was around noon when a food truck rolled up to a Venezuelan state-subsidized supermarket in the town of Guarenas just east of the capital.
But, to the fury of the long line of people waiting out front, the cargo wasn’t unloaded. Instead soldiers took it away.
“We want food!” the crowd roared in protest, to no avail. Some tried to run after the truck.

Under the state of emergency imposed by President Nicolas Maduro, the military, along with government-organized civilian committees, ensures that food packets are delivered door-to-door in order to — as officials say — cut out black market operators.

Venezuelans have set their clocks ahead by half an hour to save electricity

With their country gripped by an economic crisis, Venezuelans lost half an hour of sleep Sunday as their clocks were set forward to save power on President Nicolas Maduro’s orders.

The official Venezuelan work-week is now only two days long

Venezuela’s government has announced enforced leave for public sector employees three workdays a week, in a bid to tackle an electricity shortage that is causing power cuts and protests.
“There will be no work in the public sector on Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, except for fundamental and necessary tasks,” Vice President Aristobulo Isturiz said on television Tuesday.
It is the latest drastic measure by the government as it grapples with an economic crisis that has left Venezuelans queuing for hours in shops to buy scarce supplies.

Venezuelans in the US say their country is worse than 1960s Cuba

“There’s no food, there’s no toothpaste, there’s no Pampers [in Venezuela],” Eduardo says. “It’s Cuba, 100 percent.”

It’s really hard to say which city is the world’s most murderous

The news trickling out of Caracas just keeps getting worse. A recently published ranking of the world’s most dangerous cities listed the Venezuelan capital at the top of the charts. The city’s murder rate supposedly reached an eye-watering 120 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2015, almost 20 times the global average. City officials were quick to dismiss the list as fatally flawed.

Why a 6,000 percent price hike on gas won’t matter for Venezuelans

LIMA, Peru — With Venezuela accelerating into an economic nosedive, President Nicolas Maduro has just unveiled a package of drastic measures — or at least that’s the way he’s portraying them.
They include a 37 percent devaluation of the country’s besieged principal fixed exchange rate, while replacing the other rates with a single, floating exchange system.
But the most eye-catching is a staggering 6,000 percent hike in the price of gasoline in the oil-rich but deeply troubled South American nation.

Maduro broke the news during a rambling four-hour speech on national television on Wednesday evening, during which he swore several times and warned that the opposition wanted to use the move to further their “campaign of violence” against his self-styled “Bolivarian” socialist administration.

Venezuela’s capital ranks as the world’s most murderous city

LIMA, Peru — Just when Venezuelans thought things couldn’t get worse, that’s exactly what they did.

The capital Caracas has now been ranked as the most murderous city on Earth, according to a new study by Mexican think-tank the Citizens Council for Public Security and Criminal Justice. 

The report calculates that Caracas’s 3,946 homicides in 2015 gave it a truly terrifying annual homicide rate of 120 per 100,000 residents.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

TheStupidItHurts: How To Get Rich When You’re A Democrat

Liberals tell us how clean and pure they are as human beings. They are the compassionate, the loving, the philanthropic, the caring, i.e., the more evolved than non-Liberals.

Conservatives? Why, they want to eat your grandmother alive on the barby.

It’s no wonder then, since Liberals believe themselves better than the rest of the society, that they would take no thought of stealing from us in order to enrich themselves, their family members, friends, etc.

Oh my!

These are thieving, hypocrite Liberals. This is the hypocrisy and depravity of Liberalism.

Rep. Bobby Rush Paid Wife $550K From Campaign Funds, Kicked $190K to Church He Founded

Social services arm of church received $14 million in government grants in recent years

Rep. Bobby Rush (D., Ill.) has paid both his wife and the church he founded hundreds of thousands of dollars from his campaign’s coffers since 2002, campaign finance records show.

Campaign expenditures also show funds were given to a number of other Rush family members throughout the years. Additionally, more than $14 million in taxpayer-backed government grants were awarded to a wellness center associated with the church he founded in Chicago.

Rep. Rush, who was elected to Congress in 1992, first began paying his wife, Carolyn Rush, in 2002. More than $67,231 in payments were made to her name during this election cycle. For the 2002 and 2004 cycles, Mrs. Rush was paid $6,000 for salary and wages from Citizens for Rush, the congressman’s campaign committee.

Mrs. Rush began receiving checks for “consulting services” in 2008 on top of salary and wages as she pulled in $98,650 from the committee. This amount equated to more than a quarter of the campaign’s total operating expenditures this cycle.

Mrs. Rush’s payments increased again in 2010 to $119,400. She was paid $148,000 in 2012. She took in $66,000 in 2014.

She has collected $50,000 from Rush’s 2016 campaign to date and has pulled in more than $550,000 in campaign funds combined since she first began receiving checks in 2002.

She was also not the only family member to appear on his campaign’s payroll.

Marlon Rush, Rep. Rush’s brother, has collected more than $10,000 from the committee. His son, Flynn, pocketed hundreds for polling and petition drive services. His sister, Judy, also received at least $800 at one point for office management and receptionist work. At least three other Rush family members have also received payments from his campaign.

In addition to the payments made to his family members, the congressman also kicked over $200,000 from his campaign funds to the Beloved Community Christian Church in Chicago, a non-denominational church he founded in 2002.

“I founded a church in Englewood, one of Chicago’s poorest and most fragile neighborhoods, and named it Beloved Community Christian Church,” Rush wrote in a 2011 op-ed published in theHuffington Post. “The church, once the site of a Black Panther breakfast program for children, now stands in tribute to Dr. King’s vision of the power of community. A social service center, a health center and an after school robotics program are also part of the church’s mission to care for people.”

Rush began pouring money from his campaign committee to his church just two years after opening its doors. In 2004, $38,500 made its way from Citizens for Rush to the Beloved Community Christian Church.

The flow of money continued in 2006, as $84,482 was given to Beloved. Between 2010 and 2014, $32,000 more made its way to the church. Rush is still a pastor at the church today.

Rush founded the nonprofit Beloved Community Family Services in 2004, a network that carries a mission of providing “compassionate services to promote cultural, economic and social well-being.”

He requested a $100,000 earmark for the nonprofit that was ultimately approved in 2008. The earmark was tacked onto an appropriations bill and was made in the amount of $305,500.

The nonprofit also received a $290,663 grant from the Department of Justice in fiscal year 2008.

The social services arm of Rush’s church, the Beloved Community Family Wellness Center, has also been the recipient of millions worth of taxpayer-funded federal grants since 2008.

The Beloved Community Wellness Center is a not-for-profit federally qualified health center that provides “comprehensive, accessible, timely, and affordable primary health care, preventive education, and social service programs available to the Greater Englewood and surrounding communities.”

Between 2008 and 2016, the wellness center was awarded more than $14 million in government contracts, mainly from the Department of Health and Human Services, according to public records.

Rush has come under fire for failing to pay taxes attached to his nonprofits and entities he owns.

The Better Government Association, a watchdog group based in Illinois, conducted an investigation in 2013 that found Rush and two of the non-profits he launched failed to pay federal, state, or local taxes on time and the actions dated back a decade in some circumstances.

Rush’s campaign has come under scrutiny this election cycle by the Federal Election Commission.

The commission sent a letter on May 15 to the treasurer of his campaign committee requesting additional information on its April quarterly report.

Rush’s campaign disclosed contributions from organizations that are not registered with the FEC, failed to provide proper election designations for contributions, and failed to provide a brief description on some itemized disbursements in some circumstances.

The campaign was also warned about its cash transactions.

“Please be advised that cash disbursements to any person or vendor for any single purchase or transaction may not exceed $100,” the letter states. “If payments to the original vendor exceed $200 in an election cycle, a memo entry including the name of the original vendor as well as address, date, amount, and purpose of the original purchase must be provided.”

On March 15, $23,000 in cash was given to the committee’s treasurer, Sheila Jackson, to “pay election day workers”, according to his finance records.

“Failure to adequately respond by the response date noted above could result in an audit or enforcement action,” the letter warned. The response date was June 20.

The FEC confirmed to the Washington Free Beacon that the committee has not provided a response to the commission’s inquiries as of July 5.

When reached for comment on this story, Rep. Rush’s press secretary, Debra Johnson, said the congressman has already addressed the inquiries and provided three articles to the Free Beacon.

One wrote of how Rush previously failed to pay rent on his campaign office, another was on the Better Government Association’s investigation on his failure to pay taxes, and the third was on the FEC questioning his current campaign expenditures.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

TheStupidItHurts: Data Matters

Do you believe there’s a racial bias toward blacks in police shootings?

If you do, why? What evidence do you have to believe what you believe? Do you have any evidence to believe either way?

Well I have some. Check out the data gathered by one of our own, a Texas boy, a black economist at Harvard.  

Roland Gerhard Fryer, Jr. (born June 4, 1977) is an American economist and the Henry Lee Professor of Economics at Harvard University.,_Jr. 

This paper explores racial differences in police use of force. On non-lethal uses of force, blacks and Hispanics are more than fifty percent more likely to experience some form of force in interactions with police. Adding controls that account for important context and civilian behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities. On the most extreme use of force – officer involved shootings – we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account. We argue that the patterns in the data are consistent with a model in which police officers are utility maximizers, a fraction of which have a preference for discrimination, who incur relatively high expected costs of officer-involved shootings.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

TheStupidItHurts: Billionaires – The Party Of The Right?

The party of Republicans eh?

Are you sure?

Do some research…check your facts…don’t depend on me:

Left-Wing Myth of the Year: Billionaires Are “Right-Wing Conservatives”

During the presidential campaign of 2016, the far left of the Democratic Party and their acolytes in the mainstream news media have lambasted the pernicious influence of the “billionaires” on a regular basis. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has identified the politics of conservatives with that of the “billionaire class.” Sanders says on his senatorial website: “Our great nation can no longer be hijacked by right-wing billionaires like the Koch brothers.” Echoing Sanders, The New York Times ran an article on October 10th, which asserted, “…the families investing the most in presidential politics overwhelmingly lean right.” This false assertion is made frequently. The top donors to political campaigns do not “overwhelmingly lean right.” In fact, many lean liberal-left or libertarian.

In fact, our analysis shows that many politically active billionaires provided money and support for a variety of causes that would be anathema to authentic conservatives and grassroots Republicans. A number of the most powerful billionaires provided verbal and financial support for anti-Second Amendment causes; the promotion of abortion; increased trade with communist China and other adversaries of the United States; a lax national defense; increased taxes and unnecessary regulations; promotion of open borders through amnesty and the liberalization of the caps on H-1B visas (which also impairs our national security); and funds to liberal Democrats.

A March 25th Washington Post article by Matea Gold and Tom Hamburger was titled, “In 2016 campaign, the lament of the not quite rich enough.” In that article, there was nary a peep on how the prospective Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton was courting super-wealthy individuals, and how left-wing billionaires are involved in politics.

Cliff Kincaid’s article, “Bernie’s Billionaires,” notes that billionaires on the left include George Soros, the hedge fund operator whose net worth rose from about $9 billion before President Obama took office to over $24 billion today; environmentalist Tom Steyer; gay activist Tim Gill; and anti-Second Amendment advocate Michael Bloomberg.

This report examines several others, such as Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Larry Ellison.

The “Right-Wing” Billionaires

On many occasions, the mainstream media distort the issue by misidentifying the political ideology of the Koch brothers. The Koch brothers may be “right-wing,” but that doesn’t necessarily make them conservative.

A September 21 Washington Post article by Amber Philips described the Koch Brothers as “libertarian leaning conservatives.” She got it partly right. The Koch brothers are libertarians, whose ideological positions depart from conservatives who place priority on traditional values and a superior national defense. While conservatives and libertarians value free enterprise, the latter believe in open borders and unfettered free trade, without any practical consideration for national security, and socially liberal causes such as abortion and gay rights. Koch Industries and its subsidiaries engage in economic cooperation with Red China and Vladimir Putin’s Russia, support abortion rights, gay marriage, amnesty for illegal aliens, and even engaged in eminent domain disputes against private property holders. Their support for so-called “criminal justice reform” is backed by the Obama administration and George Soros.

There are some billionaires associated with right-wing causes. But the record is mixed. Billionaire hedge fund operator and GOP donor Paul Singer supports a strong Israel, while promoting homosexual marriage. Billionaire Sheldon Adelson, a major GOP donor who runs the Las Vegas Sands, America’s largest casino company, promotes U.S. support for Israeli interests but endorses amnesty for illegal aliens.

Of course, one can’t mention the political influence of billionaires without noting the views of billionaire Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who, in the past, has funded the campaigns of both Democrats and Republicans. In the current campaign, Trump opposes President Obama’s Iran nuclear deal, supports a strong Israel, opposes Muslim immigration and wants Mexico to build a wall to keep their citizens from illegally entering the United States. He criticizes China’s trade practices but has a history of trying to invest in the old Soviet Union and Russia.

Bill Gates

The October 19, 2015, Forbes Magazine lists the top 20 billionaires who are actively involved in supporting political campaigns. Microsoft founder and former CEO Bill Gates, often described as the world’s richest man, is one of the most prominent.

Though a successful capitalist, Gates has expressed admiration for Communist China, funded pro-abortion and anti-Second Amendment causes, and supported more Democrats than Republicans in recent election cycles. One of his favorite causes is the United Nations, through which he finances development of an HIV/AIDS vaccine. He also supports a global tax to generate revenue for the U.N.

Strangely, Gates contemptuously dismissed any role of the free market in playing a role in developing U.S. energy policy. He noted that “Yes, the government will be somewhat inept…But the private sector is in general inept. How many companies do venture capitalists invest in that go poorly? By far most of them.” Instead, Gates prescribed a massive swathe of government regulations to ostensibly protect the environment.

During the recent visit of Chinese Communist ruler Xi Jinping to the United States, he made a point of having a luxurious dinner at Bill Gates’ opulent residence in Washington State. Gates praised the state-dominated Chinese economy as “a brand-new form of capitalism, and as a consumer it’s the best thing that ever happened.” Gates commended the tightly controlled and oppressed Chinese working class for its “willingness to work hard and not having quite the same medical overhead or legal overhead.” Clearly, Gates implicitly appreciates the fact that the cowed Chinese workforce is not protected from the very real abuses of the Communist Party, of foreign multinationals resident in the People’s Republic, and crony capitalists tied in with the Party.

Gates also aggressively made use of the government’s H-1B visa program to hire foreigners that could be compensated less than Americans who invested their own time and money to work in IT fields. Out of a workforce totaling 125,000, Microsoft laid off 18,000 of its employees. This occurred scarcely after Gates called for the lifting of all caps on H-1B visa holders, thus further inflating the U.S. labor market to the detriment of job-hungry Americans. Such labor practices open the door to potential high technology thefts, lost purchasing power of thousands of Americans, and lost tax revenues for state, local, and the federal government.

The new book by Michelle Malkin and John Miano, Sold Out, examines how “high-tech billionaires” such as Gates have lobbied for more H-1B visas and the controversial federal “Common Core” educational standards. The authors name Rupert Murdoch, founder of the parent company of Fox News, and GOP mega-donor Sheldon Adelson, as supporters of the “Big Tech, open-borders agenda.”

In a New York Times op-ed, Gates, Adelson and Warren Buffett supported amnesty for illegal aliens. The column noted that legislation supported by Obama, many liberal Democrats, and establishment Republicans “included a sensible plan that would have allowed illegal residents to obtain citizenship, though only after they had earned the right to do so. Americans are a forgiving and generous people, and who among us is not happy that their forebears—whatever their motivation or means of entry—made it to our soil?”

The Gates Foundation subsidized Planned Parenthood of America, the International Planned Parenthood Federation, and Planned Parenthood of Western Washington to the tune of $71 million from 2009 to 2013. Gates himself admitted that he grew up in a family environment that was friendly to abortion and told Bill Moyers that his father was the head of the local Planned Parenthood.

Gates has also lent considerable support to the anti-Second Amendment activists and special interests. He donated over $1 million to a voter initiative in Washington State which would impose a system of “universal background checks” for all gun buyers. According to Frank Miniter, this initiative would also place severe restrictions on hunting and shooting clubs, which pushed the Washington Council of Police and Sheriffs to oppose this proposal. Miniter also reported that the Gates-funded initiative would make it “more expensive and burdensome for private Americans to do what they’ve always done: trade, buy and sell guns among themselves. According to the Gates initiative, a gun owner can’t sell a Winchester Model 70 rifle to a friend without running the transfer through a licensed gun dealer and paying fees and taxes. A gun owner on a skeet range also can’t say, ‘Hey Bob, can I try a round with your Beretta? I’m thinking about buying a Beretta.’ He can’t buy the gun because, unless he runs off to a licensed dealer and does a lot of paperwork and pays fees, it would be illegal.”

Perhaps it should be no great surprise that Gates and his foundation dumped more money into the political campaigns of Democrats than Republicans in the elections of 2014. They included such hard-core leftists as Congressman Jim McDermott (D-WA) and Senator Patty Murray (D-WA).

Warren Buffett

Another politically active billionaire who clearly advances the agenda of a myriad of liberal causes is Warren Buffett. Although a great source of wisdom for ordinary investors, the super-wealthy investor guru supported measures which would clearly impair investment and opportunity in the American economy.

Buffett urges higher taxes on the wealthy and castigates his fellow super wealthy class for evading taxes. Yet Buffett’s firm, Berkshire Hathaway, funded the relocation of Burger King Worldwide to Canada in order to participate in the very tax dodging that he says he opposes. Even Obama agreed that the Buffett Rule of raising taxes on billionaires and millionaires was a “gimmick.” Buffett himself seems to avoid paying his “fair share” of taxes. According to Barron’s, Buffett “for the tax year 2010, he [Buffett] paid $6.9 million on taxable income of $39.8 million, according to partial disclosures he made in 2011. What is astounding about those numbers is not the 17.3% tax rate, but that Buffett’s $39.8 million of taxable income is only about 0.05% of his reported net worth.”

Buffett and his family foundations supported other causes associated with the far left. The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation provided $600 million to organizations promoting abortion. Funds were also provided by Buffett himself and his firm Berkshire Hathaway. The director of the foundation’s domestic programs, Judith DeSarno, remarked that Buffett’s motivation to support abortion-related causes was economic: “For Warren, it’s economic…He thinks that unless women can control their fertility—and that it’s basically their right to control their fertility—that you are sort of wasting more than half of the brainpower in the United States.” Buffett also supports amnesty for illegal aliens. He noted that “people should be able to earn citizenship that are here…I do not think we should deport millions and millions of people…so I think we should have a real path to citizenship.” Buffett also provided support for gun control advocacy organizations. For example, he served on the board of Everytown for Gun Safety.

Perhaps it is no surprise that Buffett provided massive funds for liberal Democratic candidates. In 2015, Buffett and his associated interests funneled over $58,000 to the DNC, Hillary Clinton, and Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR). Buffett was also an early donor to the Obama campaign. In 2007, Buffet donated almost $7,000 to Obama’s war chest. Other estimates spoke of donations of $13,800 to the Obama campaign. Buffett and his allied interests donated funds to the campaign of Hillary Clinton. Buffett also donated $30,800 to the Democratic National Committee in 2011 and another $30,000 in 2012. It is no surprise that Fortune Magazine ranked Buffett as the seventh largest contributor to political campaigns. Buffett the Billionaire himself had words of admiration for the socialist Bernie Sanders, saying in an interview with Reuters that “I think we all have lessons to learn from him (Sanders).” In the end, Buffett stuck by his support for Hillary Clinton.

Larry Ellison and the Waltons

Billionaires such as Larry Ellison of Oracle and the Waltons of Walmart fame are examples of billionaires who personally, or through their corporations, support various left-wing causes and candidates and communist regimes.

Walmart was a well-known promoter of engagement with the communist countries of Vietnam and China, and a board member of the US-Cuba Trade Council. The US-Cuba Trade Council was a big-business lobbying group which sought the elimination of the American embargo on Communist Cuba.

Ellison attended a White House dinner which hosted the Communist ruler Xi Jinping, other top Red Chinese officials, CEOs of big American corporations, Obama administration officials and assorted Democratic senators and representatives. Ellison was a staunch supporter of free trade with Red China. He observed that “the Biggest Risk is not investing in China. That is a mistake we are not going to make.”

The reality is that high technology and capitalist investment are all part of the Communist Chinese strategy of modernizing communism in China and other like-minded nations by using the wealth generated by capitalism.

Oracle is also an active force in lobbying for the expansion of the pool of H-1B workers in the United States. In 2013, they lobbied the U.S. Senate for an increase of H-1B visa workers from 65,000 to 180,000. Besides the economic impact, the issuance of H-1B visas also opens up a potential national security risk. According to government statistics from 2012, 22,858 H-1B visa holders are Russian, Red Chinese and Venezuelan nationals. As Hannas, Mulvenon, and Puglisi wrote: “Complementing the technology outreach organizations in China and PRC venues operating within the United States itself are well over 100 US-registered China advocacy groups that aim directly at technology transfer or achieve this as a consequence of their organizational structure. While some of these groups are open to professionals of any ethnicity, most are made up of overseas Chinese-US citizens, green card holders, H-1B visa workers, and graduate students-whose interests coincide with those of their ancestral country.”

While prosecuting Chinese espionage agents, U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag remarked that “As today’s case demonstrates, sensitive technology developed by US companies in Silicon Valley and throughout California continues to be vulnerable to coordinated and complex efforts sponsored by foreign governments to steal that technology.” Hence, the issuance of H-1B visas facilitates technology transfers and leaks to China, Russia, and Venezuela (which in turn would pass technologies to their anti-American sponsors).

Oracle has bankrolled Republicans, along with some of the most left-wing Democrats one can find.


Despite the ranting of Sanders or the misreporting by various mainstream media outlets, the evidence shows that many billionaires are not ideological conservatives or right-wingers. The “billionaire class” is mostly on the side of Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, and the causes embraced by the Democratic Party.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

TheStupidItLies: More On The Origins of BLM

The Black Lives Matter movement (BLM) casts itself as a spontaneous uprising born of inner city frustration, but is, in fact, the latest and most dangerous face of a web of well-funded communist/socialist organizations that have been agitating against America for decades. Its agitation has provoked police killings and other violence, lawlessness and unrest in minority communities throughout the U.S. If allowed to continue, that agitation could devolve into anarchy and civil war. The BLM crowd appears to be spoiling for just such an outcome.

Nevertheless, BLM appears to be exercising considerable leverage over the Democratic Party, in part by pressuring and intimidating Democratic candidates such as Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders (VT) into embracing their cause. The movement could also assist President Obama’s exploitation of racial divisions in society beyond his final term in office.

This report examines in detail, for the first time, how communist groups have manipulated the cause of Black Lives Matter, and how money from liberal foundations has made it all possible.

Leftist origins

Exploiting blacks to promote Marxist revolution is an old tactic. The late Larry Grathwohl, former FBI informant in the Weather Underground, understood from personal experience how white communists exploited blacks and other minority groups. He said that Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn regarded Barack Obama, whose political career they sponsored, as a tool – a puppet – to use against white America. Obama’s legacy at home will certainly include more racial division.

BLM launched in 2013 with a Twitter hashtag, #BlackLivesMatter, after neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman was acquitted in the Trayvon Martin killing. Radical Left activists Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi claim credit for the slogan and hashtag. Following the Michael Brown shooting in August 2014, Dream Defenders, an organization led by Working Families Party (ACORN) activist and Occupy Wall Street anarchist Nelini Stamp, popularized the phrase “Hands Up–Don’t Shoot!” which has since become BLM’s widely recognized slogan.

Garza, Cullors and Tometi all work for front groups of the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO), one of the four largest radical Left organizations in the country. The others are the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS). Nelini Stamp’s ACORN – now rebranded under a variety of different names – works with all four organizations, and Dream Defenders is backed by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center and others.

FRSO is a hereditary descendant of the New Communist Movement, which was inspired by Mao and the many communist revolutions throughout the world in the 1960s and 1970s. FRSO split into two separate groups in 1999, FRSO/Fight Back and FRSO/OSCL (Freedom Road Socialist Organization/Organizaciόn Socialista del Camino para la Libertad). Black Lives Matter and its founders are allied with the latter group. Future references to FRSO in this article refer to FRSO/OSCL.

FRSO is comprised of dozens of groups. The radical Left model is based on alliances of many organizations that are working on separate issues but dedicated ultimately to the same thing: overthrowing our society in order to replace it with a hardcore socialist (read communist) one.

The goal is to present the appearance of a formidable mass of organizations. Some are large, but many are little more than a website or Facebook page. When necessary, they can all come together to promote the cause du jour. The deaths of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and others were mere pretexts for socialist agitation. The real enemy is “the system.” This is why the BLM crowd denies the facts of those cases. As Stamp has said, “we are actually trying to change the capitalist system we have today because it’s not working for any of us.”

BLM is one of many projects undertaken by the FRSO. Except for the website,, there is no actual organization. The website implicitly acknowledges this, describing #BlackLivesMatter as “an online forum intended to build connections between Black people and our allies to fight anti-Black racism, to spark dialogue among Black people, and to facilitate the types of connections necessary to encourage social action and engagement.”

FRSO membership is disproportionately represented by blacks, gays and women, and self-consciously emphasizes those issues. Garza, who penned a “Herstory” of BLM, is a ” queer,” black veteran activist involved in numerous FRSO organizations. Her resumé includes:

Cullors describes herself as a “working class, queer, black woman.” She claims the country killed her father, a drug addict. At a 2015 Netroots Nation conference, Cullors led chants shouting, “If I die in police custody, burn everything down… rise the f— up! That is the only way mother—–s like you will listen!” Cullors founded and directs Dignity and Power Now (DPN), which claims to seek “dignity and power of incarcerated people, their families, and communities.”

Cullors was trained by Eric Mann, a former Weather Underground leader who exhorts followers to become “anti-racist, anti-imperialist” activists. Mann runs another FRSO front, the Labor/Community Strategy Center. Like most professional leftists, he makes good money – over $225,000 annually – living in “the system” he advocates destroying.

Tometi is the daughter of illegal aliens from Nigeria. While in college, she worked for the ACLU defending illegal aliens against “vigilantes” opposed to illegal immigration. She is currently the executive director of Black Alliance for Just Immigration (BAJI).

The funding

FRSO/BLM organizations are generously supported by a universe of wealthy foundations. Some, like those employing BLM founders Garza and Tometi, receive money directly. Others, like Cullors’ DPN, are financed by organizations designed specifically to underwrite the activities of others. Amounts reflect donations received over approximately the past decade.

NDWA (Garza) – 2013 revenues were $5.5 million. The NDWA board includes two members of CASA de Maryland, the Illegals’ version of ACORN. CASA also received a grant from NDWA in 2013, as did the radical Left Institute for Policy Studies. NDWA receives funding from the following foundations:


BLM2POWER (Garza) – 2013 revenues were $456,676, including $92,173 in government grants. POWER evolved from the now defunct communist group STORM (Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement). Obama’s former “Green Jobs Czar” the self-described communist, Van Jones, served on STORM’s board.


BLM3RTTC (Garza) – 2013 revenues were $248,190. RTTC is a nationwide network of activist organizations that resists the gentrification of inner cities because it displaces “low-income people, people of color, marginalized LGBTQ communities, and youths of color…”


BLM4SOUL (Garza) – Despite its small size (2013 revenues at $110,304), SOUL claims to have trained 679 organizers in 2013.


BLM5BAJI (Tometi) – 2013 revenues were $321,570. This modest organization only lists two full-time staff, yet receives support from many recognizable foundations.


BLM6Cullors’ DPN is underwritten by Community Partners, a Los Angeles based non-profit with a $24 million budget (including $4 million in government grants) that fiscally sponsors non-profits. It is not an FRSO organization.

Advancement Project (AP) – an FRSO group that funds a variety of radical causes. AP sees America as a racist, oppressive nation and, according to Discover the Networks, “works to organize ‘communities of color’ into politically cohesive units while disseminating its leftist worldviews and values as broadly as possible by way of a sophisticated communications department.” Its 2013 revenues were $11.3 million.


BLM7Movement Strategy Center (MSC) – also facilitates funding, development and advancement of FRSO organizations. Its 2013 revenues were $7.5 million, including $156,032 in government grants.


BLM8The return of Van Jones

Mainstream funders have helped fund BLM as well. For example, United Way has partnered with A&E and iHeartMedia to create Shining the Light Advisors, a committee of “nationally known experts and leaders in racial and social justice,” to oversee grant disbursements. These “advisors” include such radicals as Van Jones, Advancement Project co-director Judith Browne Dianis, and Rinku Sen, president of the Applied Research Center (ARC).


BLM9BLM’s mission includes a kitchen sink of favored radical Left causes, including support of poverty elimination programs, prison deinstitutionalization, illegal immigration and gay rights. Highlighting FRSO’s orientation toward gay blacks, it describes how “Black, queer and trans folks bear a unique burden from a hetero-patriarchal society that disposes of us like garbage and simultaneously fetishizes us and profits off of us, and that is state violence.”

Its wide network of affiliates and partner organizations like CPUSA and ACORN allows BLM to turn out large crowds. Many participate simply to protest, commit violence, loot or all three.

FRSO was prominent at the Ferguson protests and videoed the event. It has even created a Black Lives Matter button. Following are more FRSO organizations involved with BLM. (Funding estimates provided when known).



  • Showing Up for Racial Justice (SURJ) is a “national network of groups and individuals organizing White people for racial justice.” SURJ quotes Garza saying that “We need you defecting from White supremacy and changing the narrative of White supremacy by breaking White silence.”
  • Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education (SCOPE) – Its 2013 revenues were $2.8 million. Led by Anthony Thigpenn, a former Black Panther and board member of the Apollo Alliance. Apollo is the secretive alliance of labor, environment and other Left activists that formulated Obama’s trillion dollar “stimulus” plan. Board member Van Jones described Apollo “as sort of a grand unified field theory for progressive Left causes.” It is now a project of the Blue Green Alliance.



BLM12BLM groups have also joined with CPUSA, CCDS, DSA, SEIU, Color of Change and many others. Anarchist and top OWS organizer Lisa Fithian, who orchestrated the 1999 Seattle World Trade Organization riots, trained Ferguson protesters. Fithian says “Create crisis, because crisis is that edge where change is possible.”

Fithian echoes Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven – creators of the infamous Cloward/Piven Crisis Strategy – who spent decades attempting to provoke ghetto blacks to riot, because “Poor people can advance only when ‘the rest of society is afraid of them.’” Rasheen Aldridge, seen above meeting President Obama, was a leader of the Ferguson protests. He has participated in numerous CPUSA events in 2013, 2014 and 2015. Another prominent CPUSA member active in

BLM protests is Michael McPhearson, who leads the Don’t Shoot Coalition.

Carl Davidson and Pat Fry, co-chairs of CCDS, exploited the revolutionary atmosphere of the Ferguson riots to create an eight-point plan for “Left Unity” demanding “a common aspiration for socialism.”


BLM13Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment (MORE) is Missouri’s rebranded ACORN group. It created an illustrative chart offering a snapshot of the Left’s grievance agenda. Capitalism is always the problem. Socialism is always the solution.



Interestingly, MORE doesn’t believe in socialism when it is footing the bill. MORE promised to pay Ferguson protesters $5,000/month to hang out and cause trouble. But just as ACORN stiffed its employees while preaching socialist generosity, MORE stiffed the protesters.

Islamist organizations have also jumped on the BLM bandwagon, reminding us of the unholy alliance that exists between them and the radical Left. In September 2015, the Muslim Brotherhood front-group Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) joined BLM activists in storming California Governor Jerry Brown’s office. CAIR also participated in the Ferguson protests. Meanwhile ISIS is recruiting American blacks for its cause.

Intellectual genealogy of Black Lives Matter

“We must be ready to employ trickery, deceit, law-breaking, withholding and concealing truth… We can and must write in a language which sows among the masses hate, revulsion, and scorn toward those who disagree with us.” – Vladimir Lenin

That quote from the Soviet Union’s first leader captures the entire essence of the Left’s strategy. No matter what the issue, no matter what the facts, the Left advances a relentless, hate-filled narrative that America is irredeemably evil and must be destroyed as soon as possible. The BLM movement is only the latest but perhaps most dangerous variant on this divisive theme.

Communists use language and psychology as weapons. Their constant vilification is a form of psychological terror. It puts America and Americans on trial. The verdict is always guilty. Facts don’t matter because the Left does not want to resolve the problems they complain about. They use those problems to agitate and provoke, hoping conflict becomes unavoidable – thereby creating a self-fulfilling prophecy. Their hatred is tactical.

Obama’s favorite Harvard professor Derrick Bell devised Critical Race Theory, which exemplifies Lenin’s strategy as applied to race. According to Discover the Networks:

“Critical race theory contends that America is permanently racist to its core, and that consequently the nation’s legal structures are, by definition, racist and invalid … members of ‘oppressed’ racial groups are entitled – in fact obligated – to determine for themselves which laws and traditions have merit and are worth observing…”

Bell’s theory is in turn an innovation of Critical Theory – developed by philosophers of the communist Frankfurt School. The school was founded in Frankfurt, Germany in 1923. Its Jewish communist scholars fled Hitler’s Germany in the 1930s, relocating to Columbia Teachers College in New York. Critical Theory – which discredits all aspects of Western society – rapidly infected the minds of newly-minted college professors, who then spread its poison throughout the university system. We know it today as political correctness.

White privilege

The “racist” narrative was turbocharged with the concept of “White Privilege,” the notion that whites – the dominant group in capitalist America – are irretrievably racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, fill-in-the-blank-ophobic, imperialistic oppressors who exploit everyone. Whites are the only true evil in the world and should be exterminated.


BLM15The “White Skin Privilege” idea was created in 1967 by Noel Ignatiev, an acolyte of Bell and professor at Harvard’s W.E.B. Du Bois Institute (Du Bois was a Communist black leader who helped found the NAACP). Ignatiev was a member of CPUSA’s most radical wing, the Maoist/Stalinist Provisional Organizing Committee to Reconstitute the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party (POC). POC was the intellectual forerunner to FRSO.

Writing under the alias Noel Ignatin, Ignatiev co-authored an SDS pamphlet with fellow radical Ted Allen, titled “White Blindspot.” In 1992 he co-founded “Race Traitor: Journal of the New Abolitionism.” Its first issue coined the slogan, “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Its stated objective was to “abolish the white race.” More specifically, the New Abolitionist newsletter stated:

“The way to abolish the white race is to challenge, disrupt and eventually overturn the institutions and behavior patterns that reproduce the privileges of whiteness, including the schools, job and housing markets, and the criminal justice system. The abolitionists do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal (emphasis added).”

But do not be confused; “White” does not mean white. “White” in radical construction means anyone of any race, creed, nationality, color, sex, or sexual preference who embraces capitalism, free markets, limited government and American traditional culture and values. By definition, these beliefs are irredeemably evil and anyone who aligns with them is “white” in spirit and thus equally guilty of “white crimes.” Ignatiev still teaches, now at the Massachusetts College of Art.

The Black Lives Matter movement carries this narrative to unprecedented heights, claiming that only whites can be racists. And while justifying violence to achieve “social justice,” the movement’s goal is to overthrow our society to replace it with a Marxist one. Many members of the black community would be shocked to learn that the intellectual godfathers of this movement are mostly white Communists, “queers” and leftist Democrats, intent on making blacks into cannon fodder for the revolution.

James Simpson is an economist, former White House budget analyst, businessman and investigative journalist. Follow Jim on Twitter & Facebook. Veteran researcher Trevor Loudon and Matthew Vadum (Senior Editor, Capital Research Center) contributed materially to this report.!

These are vicious, murdering Liberals. This is vicious, murdering Liberalism.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

TheStupidItHurts: The Party Of Billionaires

Liberals will tell you the Republican party is the party of billionaires. They’ll tell you that only Liberals care about the common man. 

Is this true? Do Liberals truly care about you? Do you believe they do?

If you believe Liberals care for anything other than the advancement of their own earthly treasure, power and enslavement of you, the citizenry, you, my friend, are either sadly ignorant (in which I can help you) or you are a sad moron (in which case I can do nothing for you). 

“Evidence”, you say? I’m so glad you asked! 

Obama’s Exclusive George Soros Waivers 

“Millionaires and billionaires,” President Obama says derisively, must make more “sacrifices” and live by the same rules the rest of America lives by. But there are seven little words that will never appear on the White House teleprompter: “And that means you, too, George Soros.” 

For all his (and his wife’s) bashing of greedy Wall Street hedge-fund managers, Obama has shown nothing but love to the world’s most famous hedge-fund mogul. The feeling is mutual and deep(-pocketed).

Soros and his family shelled out $250,000 for Obama’s inauguration, $60,000 in direct campaign contributions and untold millions more to liberal activist groups pushing the White House agenda. While the class warrior-in-chief assails conniving financiers who exploit loopholes and corporate titans who imperil the planet, he lets the Soros exemptions to his attack-the-rich rules slide like butter on a hot plate.

This week, for example, Soros announced he was “quitting” the hedge-fund industry. The headlines emphasized his decision to return about $750 million to outside investors (a drop in his $30 billion bucket of personal wealth). He’s reconstituting the business that landed him on Forbes magazine’s “wealthiest people” list as a “family” interest. But the move has “self-serving politics” written all over it.

Over the past year, Soros provided coveted support for Obama and the Democrats’ Byzantine financial “reforms” under the sweeping Dodd-Frank law. He preached to financial publications around the world about the need for increased regulatory controls over his industry. And in November 2008, while paying obligatory lip service to concerns about going too far, he submitted a statement to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform that recommended: “The entire regulatory framework needs to be reconsidered, and hedge funds need to be regulated within that framework.”

Frameworks for thee, but not for he, however.

Under Title IV of Dodd-Frank, hedge funds were required to abide by new registration and reporting requirements in an attempt to better police systemic risk (not that the feckless Securities and Exchange Commission has ever been able to fulfill that mission). To evade the regulations, Soros and other firms have used a recently passed rule allowing so-called family offices to shield themselves from both registration and disclosure rules that would have subjected Soros Inc. to a new “Financial Stability Oversight Council.”

Somehow, in touting its one-year anniversary last week, there was nary a peep about the myriad loopholes and de facto waivers being granted to Obama’s powerful benefactors whose names start with “S” and end in “-oros.”

GOP Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama called Soros’ hypocrisy out, telling Reuters this week: “It appears that Mr. Soros talked up financial reform only to sell it short. Don’t be surprised to see his fellow Wall Street financiers follow suit.”

This comes on top of the Obama administration’s $2 billion offering in 2009 to Brazilian state-owned offshore oil-drilling company Petrobras — in which Soros and his management company own an $811 million stake

Posted in General | Leave a comment

TheStupidItHurts: Who’s Behind Black Lives Matter?

Do you believe that Black Lives Matter represents the majority of black Americans in the United States? Do you believe that because all you hear from the national media outlets, i.e., ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS are interviews with black individuals who seem to bless the movement?

Do you ask yourself, “Where are the detractors?” Could the answer be that no one wants to interview them? At least not until a mass murder of police officers hits Dallas…indeed then by the grace of the media we got to hear from a few. But only a few men on the street.

Where are the leaders of the contrary view? They exist in droves but their voices aren’t being broadcast. Why don’t we hear from them except in conservative blogs and sparse examples on YouTube?

Are you aware of the fact that it would appear most of the “protestors” in the Michael Brown case in Ferguson MO came from outside the State? Did you know that individuals were paid by Leftist groups to come and loot, pillage, destroy and do all of those “compassionate”, “loving” things Liberals do to advance the Cause?

What if what you’re hearing is nothing more than the natural tendency of the “news” organizations to bring you the worst of the news rather than the better? What if what you’re “seeing” doesn’t represent the majority of black Americans, but rather provides a deliberate, one-sided view?

Stop and Think about it.

I’m not saying that there’s some conspiracy here because there doesn’t necessarily have to be. Not that I would be at all surprised if there were of course. As I’ve shown you time after time after time after time, the Liberal must lie as part of the practice of his faith: 

We must be ready to employ trickery, deceit, law-breaking, withholding and concealing truth… We can and must write in a language which sows among the masses hate, revulsion, and scorn toward those who disagree with us.”—Vladimir Lenin

Just ask yourself, “Does good news sell like bad news”?

The below is an article by a local (to Texas) black pastor that I find very compelling, well reasoned and authentic.

Do some research. Google George Wiley, George Soros, Richard Cloward, Frances Piven, Saul Alinsky.

May Yahveh bless this pastor’s efforts in proclaiming the truth:

WARNING: The Real Power and Purpose Behind the ‘Black Lives Matter’ Movement 

Whatever legitimacy the “Black Lives Matters” (BLM) movement may have is lost in its funding from one George Soros. Mr. Soros is the major financial source responsible for funding the leftist movement in America. (See link for list of left wing organization funded by George Soros. ( These left-wing groups supported by Soros have one thing in common: to transform America.

Groups like ACORN and Occupy Wall Street are a disruptive influence in our culture and seek to divide and transform our society into a Marxist design. Linked to this disruptive scheme is Black Lives Matters through Soros support and funds.

George Soros’s funding of the BLM movement is part of an integration into a tapestry of organizations used to disrupt and weaken our society to engineer a socialistic transformation. Since the 1920s and 1930s, as presented in Harold Cruse’s book “The Crisis of The Negro Intellectual,” there has been a focused strategy by the Communist party to use the black community and the poor as a battering ram against “the system” for the purpose of fundamentally changing America into a leftist utopia. Their successful efforts in infiltrating the civil rights movement and other legitimate struggles for justice has been well-documented by many historians and scholars recording the history of the civil rights movement in America.

There is an example of how this co-optation has played out in recent history that demonstrates how the left uses black and poor communities to advance their agenda. George Wiley, who was an agent of Richard Cloward and Frances Piven, Marxist professors at Columbia University, formed a group called the “National Welfare Rights Movement” in 1969. This leftist organization exploited the poor with a plan to implement a socialistic strategy to overwhelm New York City’s welfare system. Cloward and Piven’s strategy to orchestrate crisis is evident in the tactics now employed by the BLM movement. Organizers and leaders of BLM are using the same playbook and strategy of George Wiley to advance their Marxist agenda in the public square today. This disruptive strategy is precisely the predominant influence manifesting itself in the “Black Lives Matter” movement across America. BLM is being aggressively manipulated by the left with funds from Soros in order to force a radical change in how local policing is done in America. Through overreach and the expansion of centralized systems controlled by Washington, D.C., the left is attempting to control local policing. This evil manipulation of black and poor communities is a common strategy that has been used successfully in the 70s, 80s, and 90s to advance their ultimate goal of “fundamentally transforming” America.

David Horowitz in his book “Breaking The System” write that “the left’s strategy called for a cadres of aggressive organizers to create street actions by the poor that would create a climate of militancy.” This “cadres of aggressive” community organizers are studied in two ideas, one developed by Saul Alinsky in his book “Rules for Radicals,” and other by Richard Cloward and Frances Piven in their now famous philosophy called “Crisis Strategy.” Horowitz suggested that climate of militancy will cause fear of racial violence which will pressure politicians to cave in to the demands set forth by the leftist who are leading these movements. These community organizers who are prominently positioned in the Black Lives Matters movement are committed disciples of Cloward and Piven and Saul Alinsky.

What we are witnessing in the BLM movement in simple terms are the deliberate efforts by the liberal progressives in America under the influence of Marxism to infiltrate and manipulate the black community. What’s behind their dastardly plan is to replace capitalism with socialism and to ultimately remove the influence of our Judeo-Christian heritage from the public square. These “aggressive community organizers” are fanning the flames of discontentment. By co-opting a legitimate issue related to stranded relationship between the community, local police, and police intimidation, they are using discontentment to advance their agenda. They are stirring passions into “a climate of militancy” and at the same time alienating race relationship in America.

The old adage “divide and conquer” is playing out right before our collective eyes. The plan is a simple one — weaken America and then change her. The leadership of BLM is fully aware of this scheme; however, the average participants (the foot soldier) in the movement are oblivious to this highly sophisticated, exploitive, and manipulative strategy.

The concern for the community is not the motivating reason why these Marxists are involved in this movement. The leaders of the BLM movement are careful to maintain a narrative that is devoid of the major issues adversely impacting black communities all over this country. High unemployment, gang crime, black-on-black homicide, the failure of government schools to prepare our children for a 21st century economy, and the number one killer of black people: abortion on demand. It is disheartening to see how leadership in the BLM movement have bought into this Marxist deception and refuse to address these issues, especially abortion and its devastating impact on our babies and women. Black Lives Matter’s refusal to confront the biggest provider of abortion in the black community that perpetrates the mass murder of our babies, — Planned Parenthood and its partners in death the abortion industry — is very telling about their concern for the community. These merchants of death have destroyed over 35 million black babies since 1973 and have psychologically scared thousands upon thousands of black women for profit. More black babies are aborted than any other ethnic group in America. And what’s not reported to the black community is that when we hear of Planned Parenthood selling baby parts for profit, most of those babies are our black babies! Where is the outrage from these so called leaders?

The socialists and Marxists leading BLM are unconcerned with these very real issues in our community. The refusal to address what has been historically and empirically documented as a eugenic plot to demographically demolish black and minority communities (abortion) across this globe is simply unacceptable. In addition, I find it hard to be believe the systematic dismantling of the black family through government overreach and nanny state intrusion into our families escape their notice.

That Marxist manipulators who lead the BLM movement seem more than happy to take funding from the likes of George Soros and betray the best interest of our community in order to achieve their desire to divide and conquer our beloved nation is nothing short of evil.

It will be the black church as the prophetic voice of God to stand up and stop this Marxist takeover of our community’s fight for a more perfect union. Pastors and spiritual leaders must lead the way in this fight for justice as well as the fight against Marxism. There must be a collective community push-back against this godless movement facilitated by Marxists seeking a dark and dastardly transformation of America.

The deception is an old design sourced in Marxist/Lenin doctrine. Lie, divide, and conquer. Lenin was so bold as to call the poor and others of the proletariat class “useful idiots” necessary to accomplish their Marxist utopia. The church cannot remain silent as the godless force of progressive liberalism transforms our communities, and our nation.

As a pastor and spiritual leader working for 30 years in the inner city of Dallas, Texas, and as one who fought against abortion and the anti-life community since 1980, I will end my observations with several warnings to those caught up in the rhetoric of the left.

Caught up in their deceptions used to inflame passions on legitimate concerns, especially related to policing in our community:

First, I warn you to ask questions of those who lead the BLM movement. Why are they dismissive of black-on-black crime? Why aren’t they addressing the number one killer of blacks in America: abortion? 

And second, is a warning from scripture: Colossians 2:8 “see to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to Christ.”

Finally, the scriptures gives a description for us of those who deceive: Romans 3:13b-18 “With their mouth they keep deceiving, the poison of asps is under their lips; 14 whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness; 15 Their feet are swift to shed blood, 16 destruction and misery are in their paths, 17 and the path of peace have they not known. 18 There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

Avoid men and women who fit this description.

Posted in General | Leave a comment