According to its official website, the purpose of the United States Office of Government Ethics (OGE) is to:
- Establish standards of conduct for the executive branch
- Ensure transparency in government through financial disclosure
- Educate executive branch employees
- Promotes good governance
That is, except when Liberals are controlling it and about to leave office.
Obama Admin Deletes Conflict Of Interest Disclosures For Top Bureaucrats
Conflict of interest disclosure reports filed by top federal officials were removed from public view by the Obama administration in recent months, a move that government transparency and accountability advocates condemn as a major setback.
The Office of Government Ethics (OGE) reports are the primary tool that watchdog journalists, political activists and interested voters can use to guard against presidential appointees using their positions to enrich themselves or others.
Uh oh?! Are these *some* Liberals? Is this *some* type of Liberalism?
If so, what type of Liberals are they? And what type of Liberalism is it?
For years, the OGE website featured a sortable, searchable list of over 1,000 government appointees, including their names, agencies and titles, and flagging new ones. By clicking on a name, users could easily access multiple disclosures for the appointee, including yearly financial accounting, stock ownership and a letter detailing any agreements surrounding conflicts, such as issues when the individual promises to recuse himself.
By January, the list was inexplicably removed, leaving only a search box. That action severely reduced the chance of officials’ finances being scrutinized because it became necessary to know the name of a person and have a reason to want to look up that individual, as opposed to, for example, looking for listings from an agency of interest.
Now, even that capability is gone, along with almost all references to actually seeing the disclosures. Thousands of PDFs have also been deleted, leaving dead links.
OGE referred press calls to Seth Jaffe, who didn’t respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s query placed on Monday.
Surely not. Surely the “most transparent administration in history” wouldn’t do such a thing?
What in the world could be the problem here?? Why do Liberals find it necessary to hide their behaviors from us?
Is it because they believe themselves above the scrutiny of the public? Is it because we the public, their lessers, just don’t understand how valuable they are to society and therefore how they should be rewarded with insider contracts, offshore tax havens and the like, i.e., how they should be enriched off the backs of we subjects, regardless of how they criticize others for the same?
It’s okay when Liberals do it, but you better not do it unless you are one!
Is this the hypocrisy of Liberals?
Is it the hypocrisy of Liberalism?
“This is a problem,” Daniel Schuman, a policy analyst at the liberal group Demand Progress, told TheDCNF. “They should put it back. It’s very odd there’s no explanation.”
No, Mr. Schuman, it is not odd. It is not odd at all, sir. This is exactly who *these* Liberals are. *These* Liberals are the same Liberals that don’t care what you think either, Mr. Schuman. Stifle yourself sir, your job is to be quiet and vote for *these* Liberals and that’s all, Mr. Schuman. Your duty is to not to question but rather simply to follow.
You thought because you voted for them and call yourself one of them that they should become subject to you, Mr. Schuman?
With all due respect, are you blind or just one of TheStupid?
John Wonderlich, head of the transparency group the Sunlight Foundation, called it a “big step backward,” saying “the administration should be demonstrating how digital disclosure should strengthen our accountability systems, and creating barriers to access is the opposite of progress.”
Previously, Sunlight had praised President Barack Obama, who had pledged at the outset of his first term in the Oval Office to have the “most transparent [administration] in history.”
The OGE documents also include “ethics waivers,” documents that showed despite Obama making pledges such as not to appoint former lobbyists, this was frequently done.
Thanks to the disclosures, the public recently learned that Secretary of State John Kerry has millions invested in offshore tax havens. The disclosures also showed that Medicare chief Andy Slavitt took actions relating to firms he had financial ties to, and that he got a waiver to do so.
OGE’s role as an independent entity is important in serving as a check against self-interested departments. The disclosures showed that the Medicare agency lied about Slavitt getting preferential tax treatment.
They also showed a former union lawyer who was appointed to head a labor relations agency steered lucrative contracts to his old law firm despite signing an agreement saying he “will not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter involving specific parties in which Bredhoff & Kaiser is a party or represents a party unless I am first authorized.”
The site’s menu now says nothing about viewing disclosures, but buried several clicks in to a section called “Media” allows you to fill out a form requiring highly specific information about a person and the disclosure you are requesting.
When TheDCNF called to inquire about the change, the form had to be sent in via snail mail. Soon after the call, they added a cumbersome online form that was submitted to an employee who supposedly would send the documents several days later.
TheDCNF filled out the form and several days later, got rejected without explanation.
“The records that you requested are not maintained in the Office of Government Ethics. Please contact the employing agency/agencies for these records,” Irene Houston wrote.
These are hypocrite Liberals. This is hypocrite Liberalism.